दिल्ली हाई कोर्ट ने 2020 दंगे के केस में उमर खलीद और शरजील इमाम को बेंच से बायल खारिज की

Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam denied bail by Delhi high court in 2020 riots case

The court said the Supreme Court had granted them liberty to file for fresh bail either before the examination of protected witnesses or after one year.

The Delhi high court on Wednesday dismissed the petition filed by former Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) scholar Umar Khalid and student activist Sharjeel Imam seeking bail in the larger conspiracy case linked to the February 2020 Delhi riots.

A bench of justices Prathiba M Singh and Dinesh Bhatt said that the Supreme Court while denying them bail on January 5 had given them liberty to file for a fresh bail either before the examination of protected witnesses or the expiry of one year, whichever is earlier and it could not modify the condition imposed by he court.

“Perusal of the decision in Gulfisha Fatima is concerned, the Supreme Court has given them liberty only upon the happening of 2 circumstances— examination of protected witnesses orthe expiry of one year, whichever is earlier. These 2 conditons would show that the specific liberty is clear and conditional, and this court would not be in a position to modify the condition,” the court said in the order.

Imam and Khalid had moved the high court against trial court’s July 4 denying them bail.

In their appeal, the two relied on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Syed Iftikhar Andrabi v NIA to contend that there had been a change in circumstances warranting their release on bail. In that case, the Supreme Court expressed “serious reservations” about the reasoning adopted while denying bail to Umar and Sharjeel.

It observed that the principles laid down in the 2021 judgment in Union of India vs KA Najeeb may not have been correctly applied. The judgment recognised that prolonged incarceration and delay in trial can override statutory restrictions on bail under Section 43D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.

Appearing for Delhi Police, ASG SV Raju and SPP Akhand Pratap Singh opposed the bail saying that they could only seek liberty as per the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court and they were co conspirators.

- ABOUT THE AUTHORHT News DeskFollow the latest breaking news, major developments and agenda-setting stories from India and around the world with the newsdesk at Hindustan Times. Operating round the clock, the desk brings together experienced editors, reporters and correspondents to deliver fast, accurate and contextual reporting across subjects that influence public policy, governance, business, society and international affairs. The HT News Desk covers politics, elections, government policies, the economy, business and markets, science and technology, the environment, law and order, infrastructure, education, climate issues and geopolitics, while closely tracking developments across states, institutions and global capitals. The team also leads coverage of major breaking news events, policy announcements, court proceedings, natural disasters, public emergencies and significant international developments. Reports published by the newsdesk are based on information gathered from reporters on the ground, official statements, government agencies, court records, regulatory filings, recognised institutions and other authoritative sources. Stories undergo editorial scrutiny and verification processes to ensure accuracy, fairness and relevance, and are updated as events evolve and additional information becomes available. Whether covering a key political decision in New Delhi, an economic policy shift affecting millions, a landmark court ruling or a major global event, the HT News Desk aims to provide readers with reliable, fact-based journalism that delivers not only the latest developments but also the context and analysis needed to understand their wider implications.Read More

Powered by Nyaya 247 News