सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने पंजाब‑हरियाणा हाई कोर्ट के जेएओ कर नोटिस निर्णय को रोका
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने पंजाब‑हरियाणा हाई कोर्ट के जेएओ द्वारा जारी पुनर्मूल्यांकन नोटिसों को वैध मानने वाले फैसले को स्थगित कर दिया है, ताकि मुख्य मुद्दे की अंतिम सुनवाई तक आकलन प्रक्रिया न चले। न्यायालय ने कहा कि हाई कोर्ट के निर्णय ने कर प्रशासन में अराजकता पैदा की है और इसके परिणामस्वरूप बड़ी संख्या में करदाताओं पर प्रभाव पड़ेगा।

सौजन्य से:- The Economic Times
Supreme Court stays Punjab and Haryana HC judgment in JAO tax notice case
Synopsis
Many individuals and companies had moved various high courts challenging proceedings initiated directly by JAOs. In April, the SC, while hearing a batch of appeals on the issue, sent them back to the respective high courts to consider the new retro provision, including its constitutional validity and retrospective effect.
âThe impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court shall remain stayed, subject to the condition that the assessment and reassessment proceedings shall not proceed further until the final disposal of the main matter,â the apex court said, while posting the matter for further hearing on December 3.
Also read | Tamil Nadu to launch one-gram gold ring scheme for newborns on September 28, first batch of 1.28 lakh rings ready
The HC had held that the retrospective provision could not validate reassessment notices issued by JAOs when the faceless reassessment scheme was in effect, revoking the governmentâs justification for reopening old tax returns. It quashed a batch of reassessment tax notices issued to assessees, holding that these notices were not issued through the process of randomised allocation of assessing officers and in a faceless manner. It held that reassessment proceedings begun by JAOs in breach of the faceless procedure were invalid.
The section, introduced by the Finance Act, 2026 to retrospectively amend the law, clarified that from April 1, 2021, jurisdictional assessing officers (JAOs), not the faceless system, were the authority to issue reassessment notices. The matter concerns reassessment proceedings involving more than 200,000 taxpayers.
Stating that the HC order has opened up a "Pandora's box and caused a nationwide catastrophe and administrative chaosâ and also interferesd with the day-to-day functions of the income tax authorities and restricted them severely, the government told the apex court that the HC judgment has far-reaching consequences on the resources of this nation.
Also read | MEA asserts it will protect national interests amid Bangladeshâs review of 101 bilateral pacts
About 8,82,146 notices under Section 148 were issued across the country for assessment years 2016-17 to 2025-26, being 0.1271% of the 69,40,62,325 returns filed. "Out of these, reassessment orders stand passed in 6,46,897 cases raising demand of Rs 17,40,038 crore. Around 1,46,544 cases remain pending, and the total revenue at stake is of the order of Rs 21,34,215 crore," the ministry said in its appeal, adding that "over 99.8% of assessees complied with their JAOs without demur."
The government represented by Additional Solicitor general N Venkataraman submitted that when 99.8% of the assessees had not objected to the JAOs issuing Section 148 notices, and the provisions as such are in place and in practice, a miniscule number of assessees constituting less than 0.2% are seeking to unsettle the law which the HC has permitted and facilitated.
Stating that the "unreasoned" order require interference by the apex court, the government said that the September judgment will not only affect the past notices but will also affect the notices to be issued in the future since the same framework is also carried forward under the Income Tax Act, 2025 which came into effect from April 1, therefore, unless the HC is stayed, it will create a complete hiatus and perpetuate a position of vacuum created earlier by conflicting HC judgments.
The issue before the court is whether reassessment notices sent in the old conventional way were valid after the government laid down that the process must be technology-driven and faceless, with the cases allocated to officers through an automated system. The faceless assessment regime was introduced in 2021. However, the law was amended retrospectively to uphold notices that were served even after the faceless procedure was mandatory in 2022.
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)
Powered by Nyaya 247 News
संबंधित ख़बरें
इसी विषय की और ख़बरें →
हाईकोर्ट ने पंजाब, हरियाणा और चंडीगढ़ को गिरफ्तारी प्रक्रिया में SOP के कागजीपन पर कड़ी फटकार

सुप्रीम कोर्ट से बरी सुरिंदर कोली का निधन, निठारी मामले में पुलिस का खुलासा

पूर्व डीजीपी तोमिन जे थाचंकरी ने 4 साल की सजा को चुनौती दी

संसद सदस्य-न्यायाधीश अविनंद्र कुमार सिंह ने पेंशन से ₹1.1 करोड़ PM CARES में दान का वचन

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने मेथनॉल‑रंग नियम रद्द किया, शराबबंदी को ‘जबरन पाबंदी’ कहा

सुप्रीम कोर्ट से बरी हुए निठारी केस के आरोपी सुरिंदर कोली की मृत्यु, पुलिस ने मामले की जानकारी दी

दर्बा हत्याकांड को मिला अंतिम न्याय: 10 माओवादी को मौत की सजा

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने स्पष्ट किया: हत्या के प्रयास में चोट की गंभीरता अनिवार्य नहीं
ताज़ा ख़बरें
- सुरिंदर कोली की मौत पर पुलिस ने दिया नया विवरण
- ब्लैकमेल व दुष्कर्म के आरोप में गिरफ्तार चार्टर्ड अकाउंटेंट को जमानत
- बॉम्बे हाई कोर्ट ने नई तीन-न्यायाधीश बेंच गठित, माराठा आरक्षण चुनौती पर 9 अक्टूबर से नया सुनवाई
- मद्रास हाई कोर्ट ने कहा: एनडीपीएस में गिरफ्तारी तब रद्द, जब आरोपी को जब्ती की मात्रा व धारा न बताई जाए
- सुप्रीम कोर्ट से बरी सुरिंदर कोली की अचानक मृत्यु, निठारी हत्याकांड में पुलिस ने किया बयान
- सुप्रीम कोर्ट से बरी, सुरिंदर कोली हरिद्वार में पाए गए मृत
- आधुनिक अपराध कानून और फॉरेंसिक तकनीक पर पुलिस प्रशिक्षण सत्र
- खनिज संशोधन अधिनियम के विरोध में पोड़ैयाहाट में धरना का आयोजन

