EC ने सभी निर्णयों को एकमत बताया, SIR में आंतरिक मतभेद के दावे खारिज
चुनाव आयोग ने कहा कि विशेष गहन पुनरावलोकन (SIR) से जुड़े सभी निर्णय एकमत रूप से लिये गये थे, जबकि अध्यक्ष और दो अन्य आयुक्त ने मतदाता सूची में नाम हटाने व डेटा प्रबंधन को लेकर कुछ चिंताएँ जताई थीं। विपक्ष ने इन निर्णयों को भाजपा‑संबंधी मतदाताओं को लक्षित करने की साजिश कहा और मुख्य आयुक्त पर लोकतंत्र के लिए खतरा उठाते हुए महाभियोग की मांग की। न्यायालय के आदेश के तहत जहाँ संभव हो निर्णय एकमत होने चाहिए, नहीं तो बहुमत का राय मान्य होती है।

सौजन्य से:- timesofindia.indiatimes.com
NEW DELHI: The Election Commission has rejected reports of differences within the poll panel over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR), saying all decisions related to the exercise were taken "unanimously".The poll body clarified that Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi did raise concerns over some aspects of voter roll deletion and database handling, but these did not amount to disagreement with the final decisions taken by the Commission.The clarification came after an Indian Express report triggered a row by claiming that the two Election Commissioners had raised objections to the Commission's decisions 14 times over the past 10 months during the SIR exercise.EC sources told PTI that all decisions taken by the Election Commission, including those related to the SIR, were unanimous and had the approval of Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi as well as Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.Also read: SC asks EC to explain âlogical discrepancyâ notices issued during Delhi SIRResponding to queries, officials said Sandhu and Joshi had flagged issues related to the deletion of names from electoral rolls in various states and the handling of voter data.
Officials also pointed out that the law governing the Election Commission, as well as a Supreme Court judgment, provides that decisions should, as far as possible, be taken unanimously. Where unanimity is not possible, the majority view prevails.
Opposition slams CEC
Meanwhile, opposition sharpened its attack on the Election Commission over the SIR, claiming it was meant to target electors not aligned to the BJP and its allies.Urging the Supreme Court to take suo motu cognizance of the issue, several opposition parties attacked Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and accused him of becoming a puppet of those in power.In a social media post, Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav accused the poll panel of hatching a conspiracy to "wipe out democracy.""This is an extremely serious news that in the past 10 months, 2 Election Commissioners have registered their objections 14 times against the Election Commission's wrong decisions," Akhilesh said."This directly means that all Election Commissioners are not able to perform their rightful duties. If the members of an independent body do not have the freedom to carry out just actions or if there is no hearing of theirs, then these are extremely fatal and dangerous circumstances for democracy. For some people to betray democracy by becoming puppets of those in power is a grave constitutional crime. This is nothing less than a conspiracy to wipe out democracy," he added.
Also read: Received an notice? Here's what you need to doMamata Trinamool Congress (MTMC) also slammed CEC Kumar and said that the opposition should reintroduce the impeachment motion against Kumar in Parliament."Five months ago, more than 60 Rajya Sabha Members of Parliament... when only 50 were needed, wrote to the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha moving a motion to remove the Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, that was five months ago. Now today, after this big news break that two Election Commissioners objected to many of the CEC's actions, it's time to bring out the Rajya Sabha motion to impeach the CEC and save democracy," MTMC's Derek O' O'Brien said.The issue is likely to escalate further as leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi has been vehement in his criticism of the Election Commission and the SIR process, alleging that it has resulted in the denial of voting rights.
Rohitashwa Ranjan is a digital journalist with The Times of India, where he decodes Indian politics as a carefully staged production with scripts, subtext and everything behind. His stories track elections, party dynamics and the things that often are buried beneath the headlines. When not parsing vote shares or alliances, he is usually reading between the lines, where the real story tends to reside.
Powered by Nyaya 247 News
संबंधित ख़बरें
इसी विषय की और ख़बरें →
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने पटना हाई कोर्ट के निर्णय को चुनौती दी: सलवार हटाना व छाती दबाना ‘बलात्कार का प्रयास’ नहीं माना गया

SC ने पटना हाई कोर्ट के ‘रेप नहीं’ आदेश पर स्वत: संज्ञान लिया, कुछ टिप्पणी को आपत्तिजनक कहा

नोएडा डीएम मेधा रूपम के खिलाफ हाईकोर्ट के 5 लाख जुर्माने के आदेश को चुनौती, सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने सुरक्षा आदेश जारी

भारत ने पाकिस्तान के यूएन पत्र को झूठा कहा, इन्डस जल संधि विवाद में बढ़ी तनाव

कोलकाता हाई कोर्ट ने टुलु मंडल के खिलाफ गैर‑जमानती वारंट को बरकरार रखा, विदेश यात्रा को कारण ठहराया

18 वर्षीय छात्र की गुरु हत्या पर कोर्ट ने दी उम्रकैद, मौत की सजा नहीं हुई

अल्लाहाबाद हाई कोर्ट ने तलाक के बाद भी सेक्शन 125 के तहत भरण‑पोषण का अधिकार मान्य किया

दिल्ली हाई कोर्ट ने युवा ओलिंपिक के लिए घुड़सवारी चयन प्रक्रिया को बरकरार रखा
ताज़ा ख़बरें
- अवैध खनन में मारे गए वन रेंजर की हत्या पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने किया रोकथाम डिटेंशन का आदेश
- बीसीआई के चेयरमैन को हटाने की मांग, चुनाव में हस्तक्षेप रोकने के लिए सुप्रीम कोर्ट में याचिका
- सुप्रीम कोर्ट में सवाल: क्या BCI को कानून कॉलेजों का नियमन करने का अधिकार है?
- केरला उच्च न्यायालय ने रिपोर्टर टीवी के MD एंटो ऑगस्टीन को शराब के कब्ज़े के मामले में जमानत मंज़ूर की
- AI के भविष्य से जुड़े निर्णयों में बच्चों की भागीदारी आवश्यक
- सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने बार काउंसिल के शैक्षणिक नियामक अधिकार और फंड ट्रांसफर पर नोटिस जारी किया
- बार परिषद के निर्णय एकतरफ़ा, AG व SG को सूचनाओं में अनदेखी – सुप्रीम कोर्ट में दायर याचिका
- कांग्रेस ने चुनाव आयोग पर लोकतंत्र के हमले का आरोप, आंतरिक झगड़े की रिपोर्टें उजागर

